I do remember Giles referring to some people as "civilians" which makes sense if you feel you're at war, which the Council definitely does. That way you could have "civilian" and "non-civilian" combatants, i.e. outside and inside the Council's control.
Ah, I hadn't read enough Pratchett to know about his use of mundanes. Muggles brings Rowling to mind too strongly I think. Civilian seems to be the consensus word, although I did play off of mundane and since it's evil!Giles thinking to himself, something along the lines of "uninformed rabble" could do. Thanks.
It is a problem - civilians seems best because it's a war between the forces of dark and light...but it also sounds like someone in the basement wearing a tin foil hat in an imaginary war. This is someone who is - by council standard's willfully blind but still in need of protection. Maybe an acronym? SING (stupid idiots needing glasses) or SNACKS (speak nothing as civilian kills snowball). Or something humorless and official - Safeguard Individual Needing iGnorance, which can be adapted in the field.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-18 12:28 am (UTC)I do remember Giles referring to some people as "civilians" which makes sense if you feel you're at war, which the Council definitely does. That way you could have "civilian" and "non-civilian" combatants, i.e. outside and inside the Council's control.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-18 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-18 02:23 am (UTC)Gabrielle
no subject
Date: 2014-11-18 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-18 06:01 am (UTC)But officially probably something like civilians.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-18 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-18 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-18 03:56 pm (UTC)So far on my list I have rabble, rank and file, hoi polloi. None of them seem quite right.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-18 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-18 06:57 pm (UTC)